Founding cohort · One client at a time · Led by Brian

Find out where you appear in AI shortlists. Fix the page evidence you can control.

Prospects can reach a first call already knowing which vendors they are considering, after asking AI. The 90-Day AI Shortlist Accelerator takes the 20 buyer questions and first priority from your assessment, delivers the priority page work for your approval, and checks the same questions again at day 30, 60, and 90.

Book the AI Search Assessment

$9,000 · 90 days · Step one is the $1,500 AI Search Assessment, credited in full if you start within 30 days.

How the work stays checkable

You approve the questions. We measure the same set four times. You keep the evidence.

Your report card from the assessment is the starting line: 20 buyer questions you approved, checked in the buyer-facing versions of ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode under a documented protocol. We run that same set again at day 30, 60, and 90. The set does not change while the work is underway, so every re-check is comparable to the starting line.

You keep the evidence, the process, and the instructions to run it again without us.

ChatGPT Claude Perplexity Google AI Mode

The problem

Your search performance can look healthy while AI builds a different shortlist.

You may have watched it happen. A prospect arrives already knowing which vendors they are considering, and you have no idea how that list was made, or why you were or were not on it.

Your rankings can look fine. Your content can be solid. Your messaging can be clear. And when a buyer asks ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, or Google AI Mode which vendors to consider, you can still be missing from the answer.

That absence may not appear in your analytics, in your agency’s report, or in any dashboard you already use. Unless you measure the buyer’s questions directly, the gap can stay invisible.

Without a stable baseline, your team can spend months creating more material without knowing which buyer questions reveal a meaningful gap, which pages deserve the work, or whether anything changed afterward.

A real measurement example

Same buyer question. Three different shortlists.

One real buyer question · ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode · shared with permission by TheAIAudit. Claude was added to the method after this example was run.

Buyer question

“Credo AI alternatives for teams that need to measure whether AI is paying off”

Field	ChatGPT	Perplexity	Google AI Mode
Appeared	No	No	No
How the answer was framed	Split the need across value management, productivity analytics, observability, cost management, and governance	Presented a named shortlist across business intelligence, data platforms, observability, and governance	Organized the alternatives into financial IT management, specialized AI ROI, and production monitoring
Sources shown	Four, listed in the expanded Sources dialog	30, with destination links visible on the page	19, with the destinations hidden behind Google redirects

What this example shows

The same buyer question produced materially different shortlists, and TheAIAudit was absent from all three answers.

What it cannot tell you

Why the engines produced those answers, TheAIAudit’s complete AI visibility, or whether a specific change will move a later answer.

TheAIAudit supplied this question and permitted the example. TheAIAudit was not a client. This shows how the measurement works, not a client result. That is why a screenshot is not a baseline.

What you actually get in the 90 days

Measure first. Decide where to act. Do the work. Ask again.

This is done with you, not to you. We do the heavy lifting, and you see all of it: every question we ask, every answer that came back, every page we touch, and the reason for each. Your owner watches the day-60 check run and runs the day-90 check while we watch. Nothing sits in a black box.

First, you already know where you stand.

Your assessment report card is the starting line: 20 questions you approved, run in ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode, with four things recorded for each one: whether you appear, who appears when you do not, whether your positioning is accurate, and which sources appear alongside the answer. That is a starting count you can check question by question. The Accelerator starts by fixing, not measuring.

Second, we start with the first priority already chosen.

Your assessment and plan name the buying decision and first pages to address. Page work starts there. I rank the remaining included page work from the report card evidence and review that order with you in one batch.

Third, we do the work. You do not get a list of recommendations.

We upgrade up to eight existing pages buyers use to decide, and build up to four comparison or alternatives pages justified by the benchmark. Supporting FAQs, schema, and internal links are improved where they support included pages. The finished page work is delivered for your approval. Your team publishes it.

Fourth, we check the same 20 questions again at day 30, 60, and 90.

The same buyer-facing engines, under the same documented protocol. You see what moved, what did not, which questions the page work targeted, and which it did not.

Fifth, you keep the whole system.

At handoff you receive the complete Measurement Kit and the one-page twelve-month roadmap. Your team can run the same measurement again without us. You should not have to hire anybody to check your own visibility.

This is not a report-only engagement, a dashboard subscription, or a content quota. It includes the assessment report card, the ranked decision, the page work, three re-checks, and the handoff.

Included scope

What the $9,000 includes

Run the arithmetic with your own deal value. Would one additional shortlist inclusion that converts be worth more than $9,000 to you?

I cannot promise that an AI engine will recommend you, or that a specific answer will change. Nobody controls that. So test the price against the worst case: 90 days pass and not one answer changes.

You still have the priority page work the benchmark justified inside the included scope, delivered for your approval. Four comparable measurements. A checkable view of where you stand and what to do next. And the complete Measurement Kit your team can run without us.

That is the floor. That is what $9,000 buys. Anything that moves on top of it is upside.

$9,000

Your $1,500 assessment payment counts toward the $9,000 if you start within 30 days. Pay the rest at once, or in three parts: $1,500 at the start, $3,000 on day 30, and $3,000 on day 60.

Start with the assessment

Your starting line, from the assessment

The 20 approved questions and the report card from your assessment
Diagnosis across absence, competitor presence, positioning accuracy, and which sources appear alongside the answers
One ranked priority map showing which product area to focus on first, which pages deserve the included work, in what order, and the evidence behind each call

Do the work on your site

Targeted passage upgrades on up to eight existing pages buyers use to decide
Up to four new comparison or alternatives pages justified by the benchmark
Improve an existing authoritative page, or create one, when the diagnosis shows that important facts about you are fragmented, contradictory, or stale
Supporting FAQs, schema, and internal links on pages already included in the work

Correct outside errors we can verify

When an AI answer makes a potentially false statement about your company and cites an outside page, we inspect that page. If the page itself contains a narrow, verifiable error, we verify the facts against documentation you approve and request a correction. The publisher controls the edit.

Measure and hand over

Reruns at day 30, 60, and 90
Reporting on movement and non-movement
The complete Measurement Kit and a one-page twelve-month roadmap
One revision round per deliverable
A day-120 check, run by our team a month after we leave, showing what the same check returns then
A one-page checklist your team applies to any future page
A recorded walkthrough of the check, to help a new owner learn it

If the benchmark does not justify the maximum in one page category, equivalent capacity moves to the highest-priority included page work. We do not manufacture pages to hit a quota.

When the main obstacle is outside your website

Some of what shapes an AI answer is not on your site at all.

The benchmark may show that the main obstacle is what credible outside sources say, or fail to say, about your company. Outreach to get your company included, earned or paid placements, original research, review generation, and active Reddit participation are not included in the $9,000.

If that work is indicated, you receive the evidence and a brief showing which outside sources matter and why. You decide whether to engage a specialist directly. Grow Predictably does not add a fee to the specialist’s work.

Guarantee

The work is guaranteed. The measurement system is yours.

Grow Predictably guarantees the included implementation, three re-checks of your 20 questions under the recorded protocol, transparent reporting, and the complete handoff.

If an included deliverable is not completed for reasons within our control, we finish it at no additional fee. If your owner attended the day-60 and day-90 checks and still cannot run the check alone, we give one more walkthrough at the day-120 check, free.

We do not guarantee that an AI engine will recommend your company, that a specific answer will change, or that an outside publisher will make an edit. Client approval and publishing delays, platform outages, AI-engine behavior, and publisher decisions remain outside the guarantee.

The founding cohort

I lead the work from diagnosis through handoff.

Brian K. Shelton

Founder, Grow Predictably

This is the founding cohort: one client at a time, led by me from diagnosis through handoff, and written up as a named case study with your factual approval.

I lead AI-search optimization for a B2B SaaS marketing team in my in-house role.

My supporting credentials include certifications in Digital Marketing Analytics from MIT and in A/B Testing from Optimizely, six years as a DigitalMarketer Certified Partner, an MS in Marketing from The University of Texas at Dallas, and a BS in Electrical Engineering.

Earlier in my career, at a major US airline, I led a website migration of more than 4,000 pages that lifted search traffic 15.3 percent, and one test I ran lifted sales 14.1 percent, the largest single-test lift there at the time.

“Brian helped me reframe AI, not as a tool that simply executes tasks, but as a true thinking partner. It improved my reasoning, creativity, and overall quality of work.”

Keith Jones, MA, Well-being Program Manager, Mayo Clinic

“His strategic insights have been instrumental in transforming my business, leading to a significant increase in profits. He has a knack for identifying opportunities for growth.”

Sharon Johnson, Operations Professional

From people who have worked with me on strategy and AI.

Day 90

At day 90, you decide what happens next.

One fixed price for 90 days, with your $1,500 assessment counted toward it. Nothing renews on its own, and there is nothing to cancel.

The diagnosis may surface more work than 90 days can hold. Your day-90 roadmap records the remaining opportunities in priority order, including what did not fit and why.

If you want additional work, any next engagement is a separate decision that starts from the day-90 evidence. If you would rather rerun the benchmark yourself, you have what you need.

You are not committing to an open-ended monthly arrangement before you have evidence that continuing is worthwhile.

Fit

Built for a buyer who can approve the work and get it published.

This is for a B2B SaaS founder, CEO, or marketing leader with direct budget authority, roughly 20 to 150 employees, and a category where buyers actively compare vendors.

The two questions that matter most:

Can you approve a $9,000 engagement without procurement?
If we hand you a finished page, who publishes it and how long does that normally take?

Someone on your team has to be able to approve deliverables within five business days and publish approved pages within ten business days. If either window slips, the later measurements may not test the live page work, and a flat day-90 result may reflect the delay rather than the work.

If buyers in your category do not meaningfully compare vendors, there is no shortlist to compete for. We will tell you before we invoice rather than take your money.

This is not for you if

You need a guarantee that an AI engine will recommend your company.
Nobody on your team can approve and publish page changes.
You want a content-volume campaign.
Your category has no meaningful vendor comparison.
You need the $9,000 engagement itself to include outreach to get your company included, earned coverage, or paid placement on third-party sites.

Questions

Questions before you book

Start with 20 questions your buyers ask AI, not a sales deck.

Send us up to three sales records and up to three pages your buyers use to compare and choose. We build 20 questions from them, you approve them, we check them in four AI tools, and in one hour you and Brian choose what to fix first. If the report card shows nothing worth fixing inside the Accelerator's scope, I will tell you at the end of the assessment rather than sell you the Accelerator.